Just three and a half weeks more and I'll be sitting down playing a World Series of Poker event! I did some grinding on the online felt to get my buy-in. I'm selling a third of my action and already have some buyers at my work. I'm also doing some intense study right now in order to be on top of my game when the time comes. Of course, all the study in the world won't reduce the chances of getting knocked out on a bad beat, but it just helps to come prepared. Poker Tracker has become an immense help for me in analyzing my play. Unfortunately, I only have a little over 20,000 ring game hands logged which isn't a whole lot. Any hard-core online player plays the same amount of hands in a month or less. Regardless of the small sample it still shows enough information for me to determine how I should tweak my game to improve my results.
Monday, May 21, 2007
Friday, April 20, 2007
Vegas, Baby!

I've got some vacation time saved up! I've been planning on another trip to Las Vegas and it looks like some of my friends are going as well. It'll be this summer during the World Series of Poker. In fact, I'm thinking about playing one of the events, a $1,500 buy-in No Limit Holdem event. Also, this time I have to visit the Bellagio. The past two times I've been to Vegas I never had the chance to go there. Another cool thing is that my sister and her family now lives in Vegas. I haven't seen them since they've moved, so it'll be fun to catch up on things. The WSOP is going to be crazy this year, but I don't think they'll have the attendance as they did last year. Last year they had a lot of entries from online satellite winners, but now Harrah's can't accept money from online sites because of that retarded bill that slipped through congress last year. Damn dirt-bag lawmakers and politicians. Regardless, there should still be very strong numbers this year. If I play this year, I'd like to sell about 1/3 of my action. So anyone reading this, just hit me up with a comment or email and let me know! Who knows, you might come away with a few grand in your pocket. Come on bracelet number one! Hey, I can dream, can't I?
Monday, January 01, 2007
2006 Results Analysis
The results are in! They look pretty grim, though. Click here to see my results for 2006. My goal for the year was to play at least 1,000 hours. As you can see, I only played about 220. If I really tried, I could have done this in two months. Of course that would mean I would have lost a little over a grand in two months as well. Okay, now take a look at a couple of things on the overall stats page. Take a look at my total profit/loss, average profit/loss, and my standard deviation for cash games. You can see that my average profit/loss per session is very small and my standard deviation is much bigger. This tells me I can have big swings in my bankroll. This also tells me that I really don't have enough data to tell me if I'm a winning or losing player at cash games even though at this point I am losing. Now take a look at my sessions won vs sessions lost. This causes me quite a bit of concern because it shows I don't have much of an edge over my competition (if any at all). It also tells me I'll have more frequent bankroll swings.
Now take a look at my overall hand stats for no limit holdem. Outlined in red are the two most important stats I'm concerned about on this page. First, my percentage of flops seen. Second, my showdown win percentage. Seeing only 18% of the flops might be a bit tight, I'm not sure. I try to play only big hands, but I seem to lose a lot of money to people to get lucky and I manage to pay them off. With big hands I win small and lose big. It could be that I'm just playing them incorrectly, I'm not sure. I have saved all my hand histories, so I'll have to review some of them. I'm happy with a 60.1% showdown percentage because it shows that I'm winning more than half the time. What it doesn't show is the size of those wins. Since I'm losing, obviously this means I'm winning small pots and losing big ones. What I should be ultimately aiming for is winning both. Win small pots to build my stack, but also win the pots that matter. Big ones. Of course I can't win every pot, so the main ones I should be concerned about are the bigger ones. I should be releasing the smaller pots more easily than I do. When there is a big pot, I basically need to have the nuts to win it. What seems to most frequently happen when I have the nuts is either everyone folds and I win a small pot or someone hit their long shot and I lose a big one. Honestly, it's hard to tell what's happening. For a true telling of events I should review my hand histories. I'm sure I'll be slapping myself for mistakes I made that I didn't realize at the time. I really wish Full Tilt would come out with a graphical hand history review program so I wouldn't have to sift through all the text.
Overall, I think if I would have stuck to my original goals to where I would have played at least 1,000 hours and have played within my bankroll, I would have turned a small profit. I think my results ultimately show I have a lack of discipline for which I have suffered the consequences. The positive side is that I had discipline enough to keep accurate records to be able to learn from it. Now that I have learned from this, what am I going to do for 2007? Concentrate more on school! Maybe some day I can turn poker into a worthwhile profitable experience, but not anytime soon. This experience has shown me how much respect I should give to all the people who play the game professionally. Poker is not a game you can make easy money off of. Not long term, anyway. The old saying holds true...Poker is a hard way to make an easy living.
Now take a look at my overall hand stats for no limit holdem. Outlined in red are the two most important stats I'm concerned about on this page. First, my percentage of flops seen. Second, my showdown win percentage. Seeing only 18% of the flops might be a bit tight, I'm not sure. I try to play only big hands, but I seem to lose a lot of money to people to get lucky and I manage to pay them off. With big hands I win small and lose big. It could be that I'm just playing them incorrectly, I'm not sure. I have saved all my hand histories, so I'll have to review some of them. I'm happy with a 60.1% showdown percentage because it shows that I'm winning more than half the time. What it doesn't show is the size of those wins. Since I'm losing, obviously this means I'm winning small pots and losing big ones. What I should be ultimately aiming for is winning both. Win small pots to build my stack, but also win the pots that matter. Big ones. Of course I can't win every pot, so the main ones I should be concerned about are the bigger ones. I should be releasing the smaller pots more easily than I do. When there is a big pot, I basically need to have the nuts to win it. What seems to most frequently happen when I have the nuts is either everyone folds and I win a small pot or someone hit their long shot and I lose a big one. Honestly, it's hard to tell what's happening. For a true telling of events I should review my hand histories. I'm sure I'll be slapping myself for mistakes I made that I didn't realize at the time. I really wish Full Tilt would come out with a graphical hand history review program so I wouldn't have to sift through all the text.
Overall, I think if I would have stuck to my original goals to where I would have played at least 1,000 hours and have played within my bankroll, I would have turned a small profit. I think my results ultimately show I have a lack of discipline for which I have suffered the consequences. The positive side is that I had discipline enough to keep accurate records to be able to learn from it. Now that I have learned from this, what am I going to do for 2007? Concentrate more on school! Maybe some day I can turn poker into a worthwhile profitable experience, but not anytime soon. This experience has shown me how much respect I should give to all the people who play the game professionally. Poker is not a game you can make easy money off of. Not long term, anyway. The old saying holds true...Poker is a hard way to make an easy living.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
